18
Why soils matters
- A european perspective
Proceedings of the Conference
We should really be cracking
down on fertilisers as a
solution to climate change,
but the Climate Smart
Agriculture rhetoric is being
used by the fertiliser industry
to avoid that crackdown.’
Teresa Anderson
alliance also includes corporations such as McDonald’s
and Wallmart.
Agribusinesses use the term ‘CSA’ incorrectly, without
questioning the use of synthetic fertilisers which limit
carbon capture in the soil. As members of the alliance,
the fertiliser industry is able to plead for solutions and can
therefore claim to be part of the solution. For instance, the
fertiliser industry proclaims their ambition to reduce slightly
the amount of emissions per litre of fertiliser and presents
this claim as an improvement and thus solution towards
climate change concerns. Teresa Anderson firmly warned
us against this greenwashing rhetoric, which actually
reflects the crackdown on fertilisers.
Teresa Anderson pointed out the urgent need to prevent
these deviations coming from industry, and to
stop
presenting fertilisers as a solution to climate change
.
In fact, accepting this so-called solution could increase the
market access of fertiliser industries to some countries in
Africa and Asia for example, which would be completely
perverse from a climate and agriculture point of view.
But Teresa Anderson also explained that it is not easy
to reject CSA altogether, as there are also many good
initiatives coming from it. Some organic organisations are
calling themselves climate smart; the French government
has recently joined the GACSA, stating that it will try to push
the CSA debate towards agroecology. Some organisations
have also joined the Alliance to promote the true uses of
this term. But, as the process began with the involvement
of agro-industry, if we redefine the term now, said Teresa
Anderson, it will nevertheless continue to be used by
industry as it sees fit.
In other terms, Teresa Anderson said that CSA complicates
much of what ActionAid and similar organisations wish to
achieve for soil in climate negotiations.
Unfortunately, the issue of
fertiliser use was not on the
table during COP21 negotiations, and neither was
agroecology
.
Teresa Anderson concluded that COP21 was not the right
place to expect solutions for agriculture. The right place
and the right ways to incentivise soil protection need to be
found, but these were not in Paris.
Teresa concluding by saying:
‘Soils really are about saving
planet earth, but also saving the planet’s earth.’
.
“Soils really are about saving planet earth,
but also saving the planet’s earth.”